2257

>How about a thumbs up?!

>We recently submitted a couple of proposals on topics we'd like to present at the next SXSW festival--and we'd love your thumbs-up support on either or both if you're so inclined.Both proposals have been included in the SXSW 2010 PanelPicker, the rather sadomasochistic tool that...

>Sugasm #131

>The best of this week’s blogs by the bloggers who blog them. Highlighting the top 3 posts as chosen by Sugasm participants. Want in Sugasm #132? Submit a link to your best post of the week using this form. Participants, repost the link list within...

>Um. Pornography is in focus?

>A twist on an old joke has cropped up around CineKink, surfacing more frequently around festival submission time: "What's the difference between art and pornography?""Pornography arrives with its 2257 compliance properly identified."Bah dump bump. Anyway...

>Delayed gratification: Sex & SxSWing!

>Going from CineKink to SXSW to Dark Odyssey has been a bit of a gauntlet - a gauntlet of pleasure, to be sure, but now that we're at the end of it, our body, sensing a respite, seems to be flirting heavily with what is...

>The Porn Police @ SXSW !

>As part of SXSW, CineKink’s co-founder and director, Lisa Vandever, will moderate a panel about the various regulations on sexually explicit content and how they may apply to all types of media producers.THE PORN POLICE: KNOW THE RULESSaturday, March 8 - 5-6 pmIt may seem...

>Finally, some 2257 sanity!

>The 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals injected a good dollop of sanity into the ongoing legal wrangling over the 2257 federal record-keeping statutes, yesterday declaring them overly broad and unconstitutional.Responding to government contentions that the regulations are necessary in fighting child pornography and that...

>Pick me, pick me!

>It's perhaps not the same level of trepidation that used to descend as the teams were divvied up for sixth-grade slaughter-ball, but we had a wonderful time at SXSW last year and we'd love to ensure our return in 2008. To that end, we've...

>What’s 2257 divided by 13?

>And, once again, does it matter if you're a primary or a secondary producer?We imagine we could claim some numerologically-significant superstition that prevents us from spending Friday the 13th dissecting the latest decision from the DoJ on 2257 regulations, which landed in our metaphorical laps...

>A little 2257 clarity?

>Over at A Savage Place, there's a good bullet-point overview of last week's ruling in Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzalez, the organization's challenge of the revised 2257 regulations. (Hat tip Viviane's Sex Carnival)In many ways a set-back for the FSC, the ruling does provide...