censorship

>Um. Pornography is in focus?

>A twist on an old joke has cropped up around CineKink, surfacing more frequently around festival submission time: "What's the difference between art and pornography?""Pornography arrives with its 2257 compliance properly identified."Bah dump bump. Anyway...

>Too hot for Dallas!

>The perennial crowd-pleaser and CineKink award winner, Filthy Food, has run into another flap of controversy, this time at the AFI Dallas International Film Festival. According to director T. Arthur Cottam, the trailer for the film was prevented from being posted to the event's...

>Yay, um… Fox?

>Fox Television is standing firm (sorry) in the face of a $91,000 fine thrust (yep!) upon it by the Federal Communications Commission for a single episode of its reality series, Married by America. Despite Fox's argument that the material in question was not...

>Finally, some 2257 sanity!

>The 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals injected a good dollop of sanity into the ongoing legal wrangling over the 2257 federal record-keeping statutes, yesterday declaring them overly broad and unconstitutional.Responding to government contentions that the regulations are necessary in fighting child pornography and that...

>What’s 2257 divided by 13?

>And, once again, does it matter if you're a primary or a secondary producer?We imagine we could claim some numerologically-significant superstition that prevents us from spending Friday the 13th dissecting the latest decision from the DoJ on 2257 regulations, which landed in our metaphorical laps...

>Yeah, so where do you get off?!

>Quite alot of twisted knickers seems to be the result of a new video promoting European filmmaking. A rapid montage of sex scene clips builds and, er, climaxes to the slogan "Let's come together." Granted, the end image of an apparently male-only...

>Say what you will

>Sorta, especially if it's in the form of a fleeting expletive. So said a federal appeals panel as it struck down Federal Communication Commission policies that had, in recent years, taken a tougher stance on so-called obscenties spoken on broadcast television and radio.The...

>A little 2257 clarity?

>Over at A Savage Place, there's a good bullet-point overview of last week's ruling in Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzalez, the organization's challenge of the revised 2257 regulations. (Hat tip Viviane's Sex Carnival)In many ways a set-back for the FSC, the ruling does provide...